The fact that he was killed on the African soil for crimes apparently he committed against African people but was killed by international forces (NATO) should immediately raise a red flag; something is definitely fishy here. Why was he shot? Libya mourns the loss and Africa feels the pain of losing their son whom was lost due to nothing but an ideology.
The united states of Africa was not just a dream but was a fairly achievable mission. The formation of the united states of Africa would have brought so much stability into Africa but that meant certain countries in the west were not going to benefit anymore from Africa. France was one of the most threatened and their role in this invasion was never that of humanitarian intervention but just another power battle, and like always the media played its role by misleading the people and ensuring that no one asks why?
If this was a genuine humanitarian intervention Gaddafi was going to see his day in court, but look how everyone celebrated his death. The U.S through Hillary Clinton laughed that a man has died, the western countries that today haven’t lifted a finger to fight Boko-Haram celebrated his death and claimed it meant victory for the people of Libya. Oh well the NTC (which no one ever elected was recognized as the legitimate government). To the ICC if you are serious about justice then why is that that the death of Muammar Gaddafi does not bother you? If your justice means killing then the world can do better without you.
We all know he was assassinated, we all know the French and U.S government were directly involved and NATO denying they knew he was the target when they launched an attack on moving cars is a bunch of BS lies. Who strikes at moving cars for no reason? Right now I can not absolve him from all the allegations that where leveled against him, nor can we conclude he was guilty but what we know is whoever killed him is guilty of murder.
To date Libya is still unstable; this is an achievement for the west and no one else!!
[ABTM id=6648]
